Saturday, September 25, 2010

Maya Buster




Karl Taro Greenfeld
Deputy Editor, TIME Asia
TIME Magazine
Issue dated 24th Dec, 2001


A central concept in the Hindu world is that of maya, or illusion, and it doesn't take long for a correspondent on the subcontinent to bang smack up against it. There's a telephone on the desk, but it doesn’t have a dial tone. The impressive air conditioner on the wall should beat the enervating heat, but can't because the electricity is out. Governments in the region love refusing visas or blocking interview requests, and always with the same breezy assurance: "No Problem."
For a full 24 years, TIME's coverage of the subcontinent has beaten the competition because we have a secret weapon: a maya-buster by the name of Deepak Puri.
Technically he's our South Asia General Manager and photo editor, and his job description sounds basic: he paves the way so that correspondents and photographers can do their work. But its anything but. Consider these two anecdotes.
When TIME sponsored a meeting of American CEOs in the southern Indian city of Bangalore, the street leading to the conference was under construction. Deepak drafted scores of workers (plus a couple of elephants for show) and rebuilt the 1-km road. And in a legendary exploit in 1990, a TIME editor and the New Delhi bureau chief were stranded in Srinagar covering the Kashmiri insurgency. To get them out, Deepak called a domestic airline to divert a plane to get them. (That’s a story best told over a few beers.)
Deepak has oiled our coverage of countless chaotic stories around the subcontinent. Just minutes after last week’s attack on the Indian Parliament, which is a stone’s throw from his bureau, Puri dispatched photographers and a reporter. The war against terrorism in Afghanistan has been a whole new ball game. Puri shipped satellite phones, computers and cameras in and out under extreme conditions, managed a primitive banking system for cashless war reporters, and kept up the flow of assignments, news copy and photographs. Probably his biggest chore was inserting people into the war from neighboring countries. “Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, they were such hard nut’s to crack” he says. “Ultimately I got correspondents into Tajikistan without (the) visas in their passports. That was pretty good.” Staff writer Alex Perry spent four weeks in Afghanistan, but his final eight days were entirely dedicated to trying to get out. “Uzbekistan’s stone-faced border guards were probably one of the greatest challenges of Deepak’s career,” says Perry. “Without him, I would probably still be shivering miserably in an unheated Mazar-i-Sharif hotel.”
When Deepak Puri tells you “no problem,” you can be sure it isn’t an illusion.

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

'The Change is here'

There comes a time when the whole system as we know it, changes. The whole process, tried and tested for an eternity, just comes to pass for a different setup completely. And this change is not easy. It is not easy to make, it is not easy to receive. But the only thing permanent, as we all know it, is change.

But can someone dare take that risk when hundreds of millions are at stake?

Bollywood. Along with cricket, it is the parallel lifeline of this nation. In Bollywood, regional bias always maligns itself with the national good, religious differences melt away, and mostly everything that is wrong in real life completely washes away to an Utopian magnanimity. It’s true. Bollywood has done this for ever now.

But then, like every other process in the country, in every country, even Bollywood has had to come through a sea of changes, to reinvent itself in a new package. Gone are the days when heroes chase coy heroines behind a tree to make out. They take off their clothes, show their bare skin and on the screen, do what the scene demands. Quite frankly, to begin with, heroes are now called actors, and heroines, actresses. Let’s begin with that to begin with — the cardinal changes.

It appears, at least from the very face of it now, that Bollywood has become a lot more professional now. Directors (or basically sons of big directors who considered directing a movie their birth right earlier) can now no longer rely on set combinations to achieve success. Now it is the script which is paramount. It is the screenplay which needs to determine which actor is capable of playing which role. No one is your “friend” here anymore. No one is given a job because you have worked with him earlier. Fact: Shah Rukh Khan is no longer playing the lead in a Karan Johar movie! And while on that name, Karan Johar, the ‘King of Melodrama’ has now made a movie with no songs and dance!

Which also brings me to the next point — about the director. The director is now no longer the same person as he was earlier. Now he is the acknowledged captain of the ship. He is the man responsible for making a whole movie. Not the actor, not the music composer, irrespective of however big the actor might be. It is, and now like every other film industry in the world, both aesthetic and commercial, everything lies in the hands of the director. Point in example: there was talk during the making of Farhan Akhtar’s Lakshya that Amitabh Bachchan had ‘cut’ a scene by himself. Director Akhtar clearly let him know who is the boss. If a certain scene did not come out right, Bachchan could tell Akhtar to reshoot it. Not call the shots himself.

And now, finally, to the principal change in Bollywood. Content. No longer can viewers scoff after the initial reels and scream, “Oh, same old, same old!” Even the same old is now not done in the same manner anymore. Movies like Luck By Chance have even gone on to make grueling fun at their own expense. Ditto with Om Shanti Om. The style of film making has changed, the canvas has become smaller and yet the entire effect has become gargantuan. Take for effect, Anurag Kashyap’s Dev D.

There are millions of small budget movies that have done well immensely. Like Udaan, Do Dooni Chaar, Tere Bin Laden. And the major issue to look out for in these movies are — all directed by relatively new directors from the next generation, and none of them have a big star in their line up. Which means that today, for a movie to make money, with cineplexes and all, you do not need names, you need content and style. And in a nutshell, ground reality, your movie needs to be “well done”.

And now, to make the change permanent, we need the old guard to back this change. And the right step in this direction had already been made. Dhobi Ghaat. And there is a reason for this. Aamir Khan. What happens when the stars that can pull audiences to the cinemas produce and more importantly, act, in such movies, not just the intelligencia, but even the common people come around to see it. And once that happens, once people arrive in numbers, there is every chance that they will go back “bored”, but there is every chance that they will come back for more.

And we need that more. Badly.

Indian cinema, and not just the unknown Maharashtrian or Bangla movie, but also the mainstream Hindi movie, is currently way behind global standards. No, that change is being made now, but even then, we are way off an Oscars panel’s expectations. Movies from Algeria make it to the Foreign Film category. This cannot be. We need to break through. And now is the time. We have everything to do this. Technology, talent and money.

Let us start making movies that are accepted in their original form. Not “international editions” which cut down on the melodrama and are song less. Americans do not insert songs and melodrama in the standard Brad Pitt film for Indians, do they? No one does. We like Hollywood in their true form. We need to make our audiences appreciate global standards. If our audiences ridicule the average Hindi pot boiler for the average Hollywood movie, yup, they like those kind of movies. Accept it.

Change is tiresome, change takes time, change is costly. But if Claude Monet had not painted ‘Impression, Sunset’, Impressionism as a movement would never have kicked off. He didn’t put his brush down and say, “to hell with it all. I am going cowboy on the current.’

It is high time Bollywood too does the same.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Blurbs for the novel

Accolades from leading writers
------------------------------

** "In this charming first novel, Karan Puri describes the exhilaration, alienation and transformation
of a young man gone off to a strange land in pursuit of a dream. And what land could be stranger than
21st century America? Or a better place to find a dream -- and find oneself? Made me wish I were young again."

-- Donald (Don) Morrison, author of "The Death of French Culture" and Former Managing Editor, TIME (International) **


** "A guileless and wide-eyed description of one young Indian student's passage to America"

-- Anthony Spaeth, author of "The Thousand-Headed Snake" & "May and June" and Foreign Correspondent **


** "This is an honest, warm telling of the dilemmas of college life in America and trying to resist but ultimately
succumbing to the need to be nearer to one's roots. Everyone who has contemplated living abroad will relate to it."

-- Rahul Jacob, author of "Right of Passage: Travels from Brooklyn to Bali" **

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

IPL - Looks can be deceptive


The Twitter website asks “what’s happening” and makes the answer spread across the globe to millions, immediately.

The definition in the dictionary for Twitter is "a short burst of inconsequential information," and "chirps from birds." And that’s exactly what the product is about. It boasts of getting 1 billion users by 2013 while 41% of users still exchange pointless babble.

In India, where rumors spread like wildfire, this tool has caught the eye of many. Twitter has become a battleground of sorts – some smaller wars fought some bigger with far reaching implications.

The country is known for politicians who are downright corrupt and will get into any venture to park their illegal funds.

Business houses have also made this a money spinner of sorts.
Though many pundits and genuine cricket lovers dismiss IPL as a ‘circus in the garb of cricket’, this annual sporting event has become the biggest ‘sportainment’ (Entertainment with Sport) in the country.

When the viewership is so high, money at stake will closely follow. According to a brand valuation company Brand Finance, the IPL-3 is valued at $4.13 billion (Rs 19,000 crore) which is more than double of $2.01 billion in IPL 2009.

Though IPL-3 has been not all about cricket but has taken attention off the field for all the wrong reasons.
The bidding of a new team for IPL-4 -Kochi Team was by a consortium called Rendezvous sports – the people behind this consortium is not known, and that’s the center of all the controversy tweeted by Modi.

It now turns out that Mr Modi’s disclosure not only claimed the ministerial chair held by Mr Tharoor,The famous Tweet Minister but also put Congress on the back-foot, breathing, in the process, fresh life into the Opposition. The government now is under tremendous pressure to ensure that the BCCI and the IPL cleaned up their acts.

Rajiv Shukla, vice president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India said that whatever is needed to be done to keep up the BCCI's reputation will be done. He said, "BCCI has a reputation to keep and it cannot be maligned under any circumstance."

What reputation, a cricket body that is indirectly run by politicians who make the Sport in the Country that is a religion murkier by the day.
Upon his election in 2004, Dalmiya’s contribution in raising ICC’s fortunes gave BCCI a strong hold in all the cricketing matters. BCCI gradually went on to become the richest Cricket Body, thus, it became unfeasible for ICC to ignore it in any matter.

Since then the BCCI has been arm twisting the ICC in matters concerning their interest. Moreover, Indian cricket chief Sharad Pawar will become the International Cricket Council (ICC) president in 2010 after England's David Morgan, making it important for him to ensure his reputation did not get hampered.

While Lalit Modi, Commissioner of the Indian Premier League, remained adamant that he would not step down, the odds of him staying on in the job worsened after Sharad Pawar, former president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and food and agriculture minister, gave the go-ahead to the move to remove Modi following a series of meetings during the day with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee and home minister P. Chidamabaram. Pawar also met Shashank Manohar, who is currently the president of BCCI, to discuss the issue but declined to divulge details.

Even late C K Prahlad, the Marketing Guru agrees on the murky politics in the country.
He quoted earlier “Given the risky nature of the investments in elections, politicians as venture capitalists, we can assume, will not settle for less than a 10-fold return.”

After three years, the BCCI wakes up to disclose the murky deals and the ownership details to the public. The Indian public has no say in the matter and as usual keeps itself on the side watching the tamasha unfold.

It is the government which has to come clean and ensure that the promises to the public about the Austerity drive and cleaning up of the system takes place once and for all.

The public has little reason to believe whether this will lead to any change in the workings of the BCCI which is nothing but a battle ground for politicians to showcase their power in the big bad world of Indian Cricket.

As they say "Let the Show go on."